Dr Khalil's Intellectual Space

Pak Political Economy +

Dr Khalil's Intellectual Space

Pak Political Economy +

A Story of Complicity

A Story of Complicity: Statistical Relationship between a Newspaper and a Politician

* The writer supports freedom of thought, freedom of expression and freedom of press as sort of absolute values.
* This analysis by him is in good faith and may not be construed as intrusion in anyone’s privacy and freedom.
* Since newspapers are public entities (though they are privately owned), and politicians public personalities, the writer as a reader and as a citizen may use his freedom to question and criticize both.
* The writer is a keen reader of the newspapers. In the month of May 2014 he noticed unusual news coverage given to one politician “P” in the newspaper “N.”
* When the month of May completed, the writer took a stock of that coverage.
* Here is the table that shows the detail of the news coverage which emerged out of this exercise:
Serial no.
Date
Page no.
Photo / Sketch
Brief statement
Detailed statement
1.
2.5.2014
13
2.
6.5.2014
13
3.
14
4.
9.5.2014
14
5.
13.5.2014
14
6.
16.5.2014
14
7.
17.5.2014
14
8.
19.5.2014
13
9.
14
10.
23.5.2014
13
11.
26.5.2014
13
12.
28.5.2014
13
13.
14
13
10
13
10
10
3
      
* Here are the results that this table generates:
1. The number of days in the month of May 2014 on which the Newspaper “N” was published = 31
2. The number of days on which news coverage was given to the Politician “P” = 10
3. The number of times Photo / Sketch of the Politician “P” was published = 10
4. The number of times Brief Statement of the Politician “P” was published = 10
5. The number of times Detailed Statement of the Politician “P” was published = 3
6. The number of times Photo / Sketch, Brief Statement, and Detailed Statement of the Politician “P” 
was published = 10 + 10 + 3 = 23
* In sum, out of 31 days of the month of May 2014, the number of times 3 type of coverage was given to the Politician “P” in the Newspaper “N” Lahore Edition = 23.
* Here is the news coverage in terms of percentages:
* As mentioned above, in case all 3 types of coverage the Politician “P” was given is added together, it turns out to be 23 times out of 31 days.
* Thus, out of 31 days of the month of May, the percentage of coverage given by the Newspaper “N” Lahore Edition to the Politician “P” reaches to 74.19 %.
* How come that a politician of the stature of P, who may not be considered a national level political leader, is given coverage for 10 days and 23 times in a month by one of the top national English dailies, i.e. the Newspaper “N”!
* No doubt, the newspaper under consideration, in exercise of its freedom of press, has all the right to give any type of coverage to any type of politician or otherwise. No questioning on that!
* However, as a reader and as a citizen, the writer has the right to object why such an enormous coverage was given to the Politician “P”!
* He may criticize such coverage as noticeable and abnormal!
* He may ask: Doesn’t coverage of such abnormality raise questions which may bear on the nature of transparency the newspaper observes? And, he may ask: What’s the deal? Or what’s the package?
* Also, the writer is curious to know how the decision to give such enormous coverage to anyone is reached and put into effect.
* In short, what the writer as a reader and as a citizen would like to know is: Does the newspaper under consideration (the Newspaper “N”) operate on the basis of a transparent policy and an open criteria which it follows in deciding what and how much coverage this or that public personality deserves, and which it shares with its readers especially and Pakistani citizens generally? Or it just operates arbitrarily?
* As a matter of principle, this question applies to all the newspapers, magazines, and TV and Radio channels, and raises the issue of accountability in the eyes of the citizenry.
* Hence the issue this piece really wants to bring to the fore is: Do Pakistani print and electronic media operate arbitrarily? Or, does it believe it is accountable to the citizens of Pakistan, and in line with that belief, it operates in accordance with a transparent policy and open criterion which it shares both with its readers and the citizens?
* In the end, it needs to be admitted that this piece tries to exhort Pakistani media to be transparent and accountable to the public it claims it is there to serve!
* So finally the issue is: Has Pakistani media any internal code of conduct to follow in its operations? Has it a transparent policy and an open criterion to share with its readers? And, lastly, do Pakistani media behave morally? Or not?
Note: This article was completed on August 3, 2014.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments